🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold policy to restrict social media access for young people below 16 is creating waves worldwide. Officials, safety advocates, and guardians are watching with great interest to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

European Trend

Throughout Europe, a growing number of countries are moving toward parallel measures.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the leader arguing that mobile devices and apps are "taking away our youngsters' youth". A law may be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to implement a age restriction of 15, citing the need to safeguard children from the "influence of the AI".
• The Irish government is developing a digital ID system to authenticate the identity and age of social media users. Officials have stated that an Australian-model ban could be "an tools under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has asked the legislature to enact a proposal increasing the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a similar action, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Netherlands has urged families to block their kids from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has adopted a advisory statement supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 without guardian approval is granted. Although it cautions of the "addictive" quality of these platforms, the move does not enact mandatory rules.

"A clear age restriction is a useful foundation," stated one parliamentarian supporting the resolution.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Approach

In the UK, the leadership has remained open to a potential ban, arguing that "nothing is discarded" but stressing any action must be "grounded in strong evidence".

Earlier, interest gathered behind a bill to impose restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately weakened. Nonetheless, the administration vowed to conduct more studies the topic.

Charities have voiced concerns. One foundation set up by the loved ones of a teenager who was lost after being exposed to dangerous platform posts argues that a strict age ban may not make platforms safer and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when young people turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to create platforms and apps that are safe and age appropriate for children," said a influential child protection advocate.

America: A Decentralized Picture

In the United States, action is mostly happening at the state level due to country-wide gridlock.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for minors to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• Florida has passed a law prohibiting those below 14 from joining social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has approved a law limiting minors to one hour of social media use per day, with extra use dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also passed bills demanding parental consent for under-16s to create social media profiles.

Despite bipartisan support and suggestions from various politicians to copy this path, a US-wide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Outlook

Apart from Europe and the US, other countries are likewise taking action.

• The Malaysian government plans to prohibit social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for Instagram to 16.

But, world agencies adopt a more cautious stance. Unicef has advised that social media bans pose dangers and "might backfire". The body points out that online platforms can be a "critical link" for vulnerable children and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to prioritize user protection.

Even as this international conversation unfolds, the actions of Australia and its followers show that states globally are less and less content to wait for the industry to make changes on their own.